Sea Orgs Rules on having children

Moderator: doubleVee

<<

Enrico Entheta

Non-E

Posts: 7

Joined: Sun Mar 02, 2008 7:05 am

Location: San Diego, CA

Post Wed Apr 09, 2008 5:11 am

Sea Orgs Rules on having children

I just found this post on OCMB

exstaff writes:

Hey OSA! Suck on this:


SEA ORGANIZATION

3 April 1991

FLAG ORDER 3905-1

All Sea Org Orgs and Units
HCO Staff

CHILDREN, SEA ORG MEMBERS AND SEA ORG ORGS
ADDITION

"...we handle the first (self) and the second (sex and family) only to achieve better function on the third and fourth." -LRH (SCIENTOLOGY 0-Cool

The Sea Org is the only group which is taking complete responsibility to handle the whole planet.

The ultimate responsibility to clear this planet lays with the Sea Org.

This is a huge task and a very large responsibility. It requires complete dedication and determination from its staff.

The Sea Org is not set up to handle or take care of children. Sea Org members getting children has resulted in unpractical burden on the Sea Org units and inhibited their efficiency. No SO installation has the job of making future SO members for twenty years from now.

Therefore Sea Org members who have new children will not be allowed to remain on duty in Sea Org units.

Such Sea Org members will be sent to a Class V org for duty and in order to infuse Sea Org productivity and thus help the assigned Class V org expand. This issue establishes the exact lines to be used when a Sea Org member begets a child.

1. A list of non-expanding, small, distant (from central Sea Org operations) orgs is drawn up by Snr HAS Int. This list will cover the only orgs where SO members who beget a child will be sent. The list requires approval from FNCC and ED Int and will be the only orgs authorized for SO parents.

2. Married Sea Org members currently posted in Sea Org orgs who beget a child will be sent to a small non-expanding Class V org from the authorized list of orgs. They may NOT be posted in the Class V org closest to the SO Org or Unit where they came from or any other org not on the authorized list of orgs.

3. The exact procedure to be followed is:

A) Once it is known that a Sea Org member in a Sea Org Org or Unit is pregnant, the Personnel Control Officer of the org where the parents are posted must notify Snr PCO Int immediately by despatch with the personnel and ethics folders of the parents attached.

B) Snr PCO Int orders the Personnel Control Officer of the org to get the concerned SO members replaced and have them report tot eh Flag Command Bureaux. It is the responsibility of the local Personnel Control Officer (or HFA) to get the concerned Sea Org member replaced. Failure to get these SO members replaced within a reasonable time period (not to exceed sixty [60] days) or withholding the fact there are pregnant SO members in the org, will result in a Committee of Evidence on the org PCO, Dir Routing and Personnel, HAS, Supercargo and the Captain/CO as well as the SO members concerned. The Continental Senior PCO and Senior PCO Int will also be the subject to a (sic) Committee of Evidence if found to be neglecting the enforcement of this Flag Order in all its aspects.

C) Upon arrival to the FCB, the parents are ploaced on the routing form which gets them through any needed ethics handling and correction as well as training for their new post in a Class V org. The parents are overseen and gotten through this Routing Form by Snr PCO Int.

D) Their posting is determined as part of the Routing Form and is the responsibility of the Snr PCO Int. It includes approval from FNCC and Establishment Executive International in each case.

E) Upon completion of their training, the SO members will be sent to the chosen Class V org to assume their new posts. They will be sent with an evaluated handling for the org. Org evals are to be provided by the Office of Evaluation and Execution of the Senior Executive Strata. The SO members will go on Garrison Mission orders which are provided by the Action Branch FB.

4. Once the child reaches 6 years of age and is able to hold a post in a Cadet org, the parents can become eligible for returning to the Sea Org provided that they have visibly expanded the org and area they were sent to. In this case the parents are to contact and inform the Vets Return Officer, Snr HCO Int that they are now ready to return to an SO unit for active SO duty. The Vets Return Officer confirms with the Snr PCO Int that the parents are eligible for returning to the Sea Org before placing them on a Vets return program and returning them to a Sea Org Unit. Their posting upon return to the Sea Org is entirely at the discretion of the Snr PCO Int.

Failure to follow these policies and keeping a pregnant SO member in an SO org or unit in violation of this Flag Order will result in a Committee of Evidence as poer point B) above.

Captain Guillaume Lesevre
ED INTERNATIONAL

Authorized by
AVC INTERNATIONAL

for
CHURCH OF SCIENTOLOGY
INTERNATIONAL


Sounds like they don't really like families, huh?
Enrico Entheta
<<

Grundy

User avatar

Sticky Master

Posts: 1067

Joined: Fri Feb 29, 2008 7:41 am

Post Wed Apr 09, 2008 6:19 am

Thats OLD too .. as of 1996, when an SO member gets pregnant, the couple is offloaded from the SO. No SO members can have any children under 10 years old.
<<

Tru2form

User avatar

Site Admin

Posts: 1204

Joined: Wed Feb 13, 2008 3:56 am

Location: Beijing, China

Post Wed Apr 09, 2008 7:00 am

Why does everything sound worse when it's in FLAG order format?
Us rabbits? DO something? - Wind in the Willows
<<

Grundy

User avatar

Sticky Master

Posts: 1067

Joined: Fri Feb 29, 2008 7:41 am

Post Wed Apr 09, 2008 7:10 am

Because they aren't written toward PR ... the intended audience are SO members, meaining only the SO is supposed to see it.
<<

AnonymousID-V42B

Clear

Posts: 92

Joined: Sun Mar 02, 2008 12:55 am

Location: Nowhere Land

Post Wed Apr 09, 2008 11:18 am

Grundy wrote:Because they aren't written toward PR ... the intended audience are SO members, meaining only the SO is supposed to see it.


What I wanna know is why people don't run out the door screaming in terror when stuff like this comes down.

Seriously, everytime more and more documents are leaked, I keep getting more creeped out.
"If David Miscaviage declared hell suppressive, I would make at least a favorable reference to the Devil in /b/."
~Anonymous
<<

Holden Caulfield

User avatar

PTS Type III

Posts: 419

Joined: Tue Mar 04, 2008 9:44 pm

Location: A Central Park Bench

Post Wed Apr 09, 2008 1:28 pm

What's even scarrier, if Scientology was a bigger and more powerful organization, rest assured, there WOULD BE "SO installations with the job of making future SO members."

Imagine that. Children separated from their parents at birth, raised isolated from the world and indoctrinated from day one to think that the SO is the only thing in life worth striving for. Wait... That happens already.

Only, imagine it happening on the scale of, say, the Clone army in Star Wars Episode II. THAT is scary.

It's our luck that Scientology is so concered about PR. The kids like myself running around at FLB without proper guidance in the 80s is why this policy was inposed.

You won't beileve the stuff we got ourselves into. We were picked up by the police and escorted back to FLB so many times. Once, we broke into the Clearwater Sun printing plant. Another time, we broke into a cement factory. Another time we started jumping on running trains and a kid fell and hit his head. The train stopped and like four ambulances came.
"If you really want to hear about it, the first thing you'll probably want to know is where I was born, and what my lousy childhood was like, but I don't feel like going into it, if you want to know the truth."

Return to Staff & Sea Org

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 0 guests

cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group.
Designed by ST Software